(The following statement was released by the rating agency)

NEW YORK, May 05 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'A' rating to the 
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), New York's $967.1 million Railroad 
Rehabilitation Infrastructure Financing Loan series 2015X. The Rating Outlook is 
Stable.  The RRIF loan is a parity obligation with the MTA's outstanding 
transportation revenue bonds.  Fitch has affirmed the 'A' rating on 
approximately $20.7 billion (excluding commercial paper  CP ) in outstanding MTA 
transportation revenue bonds.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The 'A' rating reflects the gross lien on a diverse stream of pledged revenues, 
the essentiality of the MTA's transit network to the economy of the New York 
region, and the demonstrated ability of the MTA to produce near-term solutions 
for its operating and capital needs. The rating also reflects the need to 
generate sufficient cash to adequately cover operations of the system despite 
high debt service coverage ratios (DSCRs).

Strategic Importance: The MTA transportation network is essential to the economy 
of the New York region, with New York City Transit carrying an average of 8.05 
million daily subway and bus riders and Metro-North Railroad and Long Island 
Rail Road (LIRR) carrying another 576,000 daily commuter rail passengers. While 
an independent authority, the MTA has received significant support from the 
state of New York in the form of additional tax sources aimed at closing 
projected operating budget gaps and addressing capital needs.

Highly Constrained Financial Operations: Despite high DSCRs from gross pledged 
revenues, the MTA's financial position is constrained given its extremely large 
operating profile and high fixed costs, including significant retiree pension 
benefits. In addition, some of the MTA's operating subsidies are vulnerable to 
economic conditions. While the MTA is required to provide a balanced current 
year budget, some tools available to meet a balanced budget, such as service 
reductions and fare increases, are politically unpopular.

Solid Security Pledge: The bonds are secured by a gross lien on a diverse stream 
of pledged operating revenues consisting of transit and commuter fares and 
excess bridge tolls and non-operating revenues consisting of various regional 
taxes.

Extremely Large Capital Needs: While the MTA's 2015-2019 proposed $29 billion 
Capital Program (Transit and Commuter Programs) was vetoed by the Capital 
Programs Review Board (CPRB), the proposed Transit and Commuter Capital Program 
assumes around $3.9 billion in MTA related debt. The proposed plan has a roughly 
$15.2 billion gap in funding which is expected to be funded through a 
combination of additional federal, state and/or local resources or potentially 
additional MTA debt. The proposed TBTA Capital Program (not subject to CPRB 
approval) is estimated to be $3.1 billion with approximately $2.3 billion funded 
from TBTA bonds. The MTA has historically faced the constant challenge of 
delicately balancing the large rehabilitation needs of the system and expansion 
projects while covering operating expenses and maintaining financial 
flexibility.

Growing Annual Debt Burden: The MTA's capacity to continue to leverage resources 
to fund expansion projects while meeting renewal and replacement needs may be 
limited in the future if projected financial performance or additional operating 
subsidies do not come to fruition.

Peer Comparison: Given the size and breadth of the MTA's network of 
transportation assets, there is no direct comparison for the entity.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Negative: 

--Inability to achieve future projected operating efficiencies and implement 
other key elements of the cost reduction initiatives and/or maintain an ongoing 
state of good repair and other elements of the capital program;

--Significant cost overruns or delays in the capital program's mega-projects 
that lead to additional borrowing or deferral of core capital projects;

--Receipts in dedicated tax subsidies that are measurably below forecast levels 
could pressure the MTA's financial flexibility.

Positive: 

--Given small near-term operating surpluses but medium-term projected deficits 
positive rating movement is unlikely in the near term.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The 2015X RRIF loan proceeds will finance certain allowable costs (defined in 
the financing documents under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform 
Act of 1976) and incurred by the MTA in connection with certain capital 
projects, including its Positive Train Control Project which will install 
Positive Train Control on The Long Island Rail Road Company and Metro-North 
Commuter Railroad Company tracks where required by applicable regulations.

The loan is expected to be fully drawn by 2018 and will have a level debt 
service repayment schedule over a 20 year period.  Similar to the Transportation 
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan program, the RRIF loan 
program has certain conditions precedent to receive loan proceed disbursements.  
These provisions are primarily administrative and are not viewed material to the 
MTA's ability to draw on the loan.  The interest rate on the loan is expected to 
be fixed at 2.38%.  The loan will be subject to certain penalty rates, as 
described in the financing agreement, including a ratings downgrade event.  

The MTA's February Financial Plan (2015 Adopted Budget 2015-2018) incorporates 
policy actions previously described as 'below the line' in the November Plan and 
related technical adjustments. Technical adjustments are generally related to 
revenues associated with the implementation of fare and toll increases that were 
effective on March 22, 2015, the release of the 2014 general reserve fund to 
reduce pension liabilities, reserving for retroactive wage payments, safety and 
service investments, future toll and fare increases and future MTA efficiencies. 
Overall, the effect of the technical adjustments from the November Plan slightly 
lowers the projected fiscal year (FY) 2015 cash balance ($47 million from $64 
million), FY2016 is generally unchanged at $102 million positive cash balance, 
and FY2017 projects a slightly higher cash position ($10 million vs. $1 
million). The FY2018 deficit is slightly lower at $305 million as compared to 
$322 million in November.  The MTA's preliminary 2014 net cash balance was $309 
million including a $314 million carryover from 2013.  This result was $151 
million higher than the final estimate in the February plan and will be 
reflected in the July financial plan. 

Risks to the February Plan/Adopted Budget include the ability to achieve savings 
from identified operating efficiencies, potential volatility in some operating 
subsidies (real estate related dedicated tax sources), greater than expected 
elasticity from future proposed fare and toll increases, and uncertainties 
associated with the final completion and operating costs of the East Side Access 
and 2nd Ave Subway projects. To the extent that any of these elements fail to 
reach current expectations, projected year-end cash balances may be materially 
different than currently estimated. While the MTA has a demonstrated history of 
closing outer-year deficits, it is Fitch's opinion that the options available 
for new revenue generation are fewer in the current environment; however, the 
MTA continues to explore and implement new operating efficiencies and cost 
reduction measures to these gaps.

Fitch continues to monitor the MTA's 2015-2019 Capital Program approval process. 
At its Sept. 24, 2014 meeting, the MTA Board reviewed and authorized submission 
for the $29 billion proposed 2015-2019 Transit and Commuter Capital Program to 
the CPRB. In addition, the $3.1 billion Bridges and Tunnels Capital Program (not 
subject to CPRB approval) was submitted. On Oct. 2, 2014, the Review Board 
vetoed the Proposed 2015-2019 Transit and Commuter Capital Program without 
prejudice. The proposed 2015-2019 Bridges and Tunnels Capital Program may also 
be modified prior to final adoption.

The proposed 2015-2019 Transit and Commuter Capital Programs are expected to be 
funded from a variety of sources, including bonds, state, city and federal 
funds, and currently project a $15.2 billion funding gap. The projects 
identified in the approved 2015-2019 Bridges and Tunnels Capital Program will be 
funded with a combination of MTA Bridges and Tunnels bonds and pay-go. Fitch 
notes that prior MTA Capital Programs have had significant funding gaps similar 
to this size ahead of CPRB approval.

The essentiality of the system to the greater NYC area and surrounding counties 
is demonstrated by the more than eight million daily riders. As previously 
demonstrated, Fitch expects the MTA will successfully implement its Capital 
Program with funding from MTA bonds and its city, state and federal partners. 
MTA bonds across all liens are possible, including transportation revenue bonds, 
dedicated tax fund bonds, and potentially leveraging the payroll mobility tax 
for a new credit. To the extent funding is not provided by city, state and 
federal partners to fill the approximately $15.2 billion funding gap, additional 
leveraging of the MTA's credits cannot be ruled out in the event that the MTA 
does not scale back certain non-core elements of the transit and commuter 
system. Fitch will monitor the carefully arranged efforts and negotiations 
between partners to meet the ultimate funding needs.

The transportation revenue bonds and RRIF loan are secured by a gross lien on 
the MTA's operating receipts and subsidies, including transit and commuter rail 
fares and other operating revenues, surplus toll revenues, and certain dedicated 
tax sources, state and local operating subsidies, and reimbursements.

Contact:

Primary Analyst

Chad Lewis

Senior Director

+1-212-908-0886

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

Secondary Analyst

Tanya Langman

Director 

+1-212-908-0716

Committee Chairperson

Greg Remec 

Senior Director

+1-312-606-2339

Media Relations: Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0526, Email: 
[email protected].

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research: 

--'Rating Criteria for Infrastructure and Project Finance' (July 11, 2012);

--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research: 

Rating Criteria for Infrastructure and Project Finance

http://www.fitchratings.com

Tax-Supported Rating Criteria 

http://www.fitchratings.com

Additional Disclosure 

Solicitation Status 

http://www.fitchratings.com

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. 
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: 
HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM. IN ADDITION, RATING 
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S 
PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND 
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF 
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE 
AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF 
CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE 
SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS 
SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED 
ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH 
WEBSITE.

By admin