Will Not Likely Be Discussed In The Mainstream Media
US federal law prohibits protests at federal campaign events
Many are now quite sure that the Trump protest in Chicago was organized by MoveOn.Org, along with various radical groups, including Communist Party USA, Code Pink, ANSWER, Black Lives Matter and Democratic Socialists of America, all dedicated to Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and mostly financed directly or indirectly by perhaps the most dangerous man in America, George Soros.
This is a Witches Brew that gets going every time the Marxist machine in the US feels threatened.
The Chicago Trump rally disruption was not a spontaneous eruption, just the opposite it was organized in advance, and these groups drove people to the protest. I is safe to assume that many if not all were paid to cause chaos.
A paraphrased statement from George Orwell’s Animal Farm–” All are equal but some of us are more equal than others.”
There are two sets of laws in this country.
During the Barack Obamacare protests, liberals amended Federal law H. R. 347 to make it illegal to protest at Federal campaign events.
All of these anti-Trump rallies, be they violent or not, are felonies under this law that US Democrat lawmakers passed.
This law was passed against, and applied to, Barack Obamacare protesters, and so it must be applied equally.
The Big Q: Why is it only a law that benefits one party on a specific controversial issue?
We are all weary of Barack Hussein Obama deciding what can be prosecuted and the media who decide what to expose and what to keep from the public.
The law:
H.R. 347: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=2011&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title18-section1752
§1752.
Restricted building or grounds (activity on)
A. It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons:
- willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting
- willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance;
- willfully, knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, to engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any building or grounds described in paragraph (1) or (2) when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;
- willfully and knowingly to obstruct or impede ingress or egress to or from any building, grounds, or area described in paragraph (1) or (2); or
- willfully and knowingly to engage in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any building, grounds, or area described in paragraph (1) or (2).
B. Violation of this section, and attempts or conspiracies to commit such violations, shall be punishable by:
- a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if-
(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm; or
(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as defined by section 2118(e)(3); and - a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case.
(c) Violation of this section, and attempts or conspiracies to commit such violations, shall be prosecuted by the United States attorney in the Federal district court having jurisdiction of the place where the offense occurred.
(d) None of the laws of the United States or of the several States and the District of Columbia shall be superseded by this section.
(e) As used in this section, the term “other person protected by the Secret Service” means any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title when such person has not declined such protection.
The citation: (Added Pub. L. 91–644, title V, §18, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1891; amended Pub. L. 97–308, §1, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1451; Pub. L. 98–587, §3(b), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3112; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 109–177, title VI, §602(a), (b)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 252.)
Have a terrific weekend.
Paul Ebeling
HeffX-LTN
The post Will Not Likely Be Discussed In The Mainstream Media appeared first on Live Trading News.